The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial surgeons have defined
emergency dental care as the treatment of heamorrhage, upper airway impair-
ment, trauma, infection or acute inflammation involving the oral and
maxillofacial structures including teeth and dentoalveolar
processes1. The role of oral and maxillofacial surgery in the
accident and emergency units has been recognized and trauma has played a role in
the establishment of the specialty as the leading expert in the field of facial
trauma2,3.
This is largely due to the fact that the head and face are the
most frequently injured anatomic sites in motor vehicle crash
victims4 and maxillofacial injuries constitute an important component
in the multiple trauma victims5,6. Other causes of trauma include
interpersonal violence, falls, sport related injuries and gunshot
injuries7,8. Severe infection, temporomandibular disorders and bomb
attacks are other instances that may require emergency management by oral and
maxillofacial surgeons9,10.
The pattern and presentation of maxillofacial emergencies have
been studied in different parts of the world. In a large series from Innsbruck,
Austria, activities of daily life and play accidents accounted for the majority
of patients, followed by sports related emergencies3. A similar study in Nigeria, which concentrated on
children, showed that road traffic accidents were the major aetiologic factors
in maxillofacial emergencies11.
This study is therefore aimed at documenting the pattern of
maxillofacial emergencies and to evaluate the treatment and outcome. This is not
only necessary for the evaluation of present preventive and therapeutic regimens
but will also help to develop optimal treatment regimens and help in appropriate
resource and manpower allocations12,13.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All the patients who presented to the Accident and Emergency
department of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching hospital, Ile-Ife with
maxillofacial emergencies during the
call hours of 4.00pm to 8.00 am from January 2001 to December
2002 were included in the study. A questionnaire was used to record the
patients’ demographics, day and time of presentation, duration of emergency and
mode of arrival. Other factors recorded include; the patients’ level of
consciousness using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) for trauma patients, the
diagnosis of the patients’ condition and the duration.
With regards to trauma patients, associated injuries outside
the face were noted as well as the investigations carried out. The management
instituted, where the treatment was carried out as well as the outcome of
treatment while in the Accident and Emergency department were also noted.
Data was fed into an IBM compatible computer and analyzed using
the SPSS 11.0 statistical package. Simple proportions were calculated and cross
tabulations made for some parameters where a statistical significance was
inferred at p value of less than 0.05.
RESULTS.
During the period under review 8,254 patients attended the
Accident and Emergency department, there were a total of 106 maxillofacial cases
representing 1.3 %. The age range was from 2 years to 70 years with a mean age
of 31.3 years. More than half of the patients (50 patients, 55.7%) were in the
third decade of life and males were in the majority (90 males against 16 females
giving a male: female ratio of 5.6:1). The occupation of the patients is listed
in Table 1. Students were the most commonly seen, and constituted 28.9%.
|
Table 1. Occupation of the emergency
patients |
Table 2. Day of
presentation |
|
OCCUPATION |
No |
% |
|
SCHOOLING |
28 |
26.4 |
|
TRADING/BUSINESS |
23 |
21.7 |
|
ARTISAN |
15 |
14.2 |
|
MOTORCYCLIST |
4 |
3.8 |
|
DRIVING |
5 |
4.7 |
|
FARMING |
7 |
6.6 |
|
CIVIL SERVANT |
8 |
7.5 |
|
UNEMPLOYED |
3 |
2.8 |
|
NOT STATED |
13 |
12.3 |
|
TOTAL |
106 |
100.0 | |
|
DAY |
No |
PERCENT |
|
MONDAY |
12 |
11.3 |
|
TUESDAY |
10 |
9.4 |
|
WEDNESDAY |
11 |
10.4 |
|
THURSDAY |
14 |
13.2 |
|
FRIDAY |
22 |
20.8 |
|
SATURDAY |
11 |
10.4 |
|
SUNDAY |
17 |
16.0 |
|
NOT STATED |
9 |
8.5 |
|
TOTAL |
106 |
100.0 |
|